My mind, my thoughts, my words

The Gender Question

Even if you’re monolingual, you are probably aware that many languages distinguish nouns in gender. Even English does so, which becomes obvious when referring to someone/something with a personal pronoun (e.g. the manhe, the womanshe, the carit). However, many other languages even distinguish ‘things’ in gender. More precisely, they would refer to a car as ‘he’ or ‘she’ or ‘it’. I am sure that everyone who’s ever studied a language that makes use of grammatical gender will agree that learning ‘random’ articles, for example, can be tedious. But is it all really just random?

Natural gender is when the (masculine or female) gender of a (human) referent goes along with the grammatical gender of that kind. However, there are exceptions. For example the Gaelic word for woman, “boireannach”, or the Irish word for girl, “cailín”, are masculine, the Irish stallion, “stail”, is female and the German girl, “Mädchen”, is neuter.

moonBut what about abstract things? All just random because a noun has to belong to some noun class? Why do Polish, German and Arabic speaking people think that a moon is a “he”, whereas French, Spanish and Russian speakers refer to a “she”?

Yes, unfortunately many nouns end up with a merely conventional gender in order to belong to some noun category. Sometimes it seems very illogical, for example when two nouns denoting the same concept differ in gender, such as the German words for car: “der Wagen” (masculine) or “das Auto” (neuter).

Frequently, grammatical gender is related to the word’s ending, indicating a morphological way of gender assignment. Spanish is a good example for this, as most words follow the rule “words that end with -o are masculine, and words that end with -a are feminine”. If we look closer, even much gender assignment in German is actually not random. The explanation for “Mädchen” being neuter is simply, that words ending in –chen and –lein are always neuter. As for most nouns, though, deflexion made gender markers unrecognisable.

Often a combination of morphological, arbitrary convention and semantics – with usually one being more dominant – is used to determine a word’s gender. Many studies have investigated the gender retrieval mechanism. A study on semantic gender assignment regularities in German by Beate Schwichtenberg and Niels O. Schiller (2003) found that when presented with random words of different categories (e.g. “Ruppel” in the category instruments), native speakers would select the gender-marked article associated with the category (e.g. feminine ‘die’, since most instruments in German are feminine)

In the end, if you’re learning a foreign language that distinguishes nouns in gender, it is probably best to simply see the word PLUS gender marker as a whole (e.g. “la+voiture”, instead of just “voiture”). Language-learning would be a lot easier without this ‘gender-trap’, but it’s always a nice challenge🙂

3 comments on “The Gender Question

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention langsoc.eusa.ed.ac.uk» Blog Archive » The Gender Question -- Topsy.com

  2. richard
    19/02/2011

    I’m not sure you’re right about gender in English. Gender is reflected in English only in pronominals, only for animate objects (with a few residual exceptions from Old English, such as ships), and only when there are feminine/masculine features on those objects. This is semantically based, and isn’t morphological. There’s a lot of debate as to whether this constitutes gender in English nouns at all, or merely in semantic pronominal agreement.

    Furthermore, you seem to split gender along masculine/feminine lines here, while that is by no means always the case. ‘Genders are classes of nouns reflected in the behaviour of associated words.’ (Hockett, 1958:231) While in Indoeuropean languages, which often have only two or three genders, this may seem to do with sexual dimorphism due to natural aligment, that isn’t always the case. There are many languages with more than five genders, and several with considerably more.

    I really suggest Greville Corbett’s book on the topic (suitably called Gender). The library has a few (I have one at my hand just now), and I’ve used it before. Failing that, check out wals.info.

  3. Gina
    19/02/2011

    Dr. Warren Maguire told me that Old English had grammatical gender (m/f/n) which was lost due to the increasing use of the gender-neutral ‘thee’ and deflexion – so there must have been some morphological connection. German on the other hand also lost most gender-markers but kept grammatical gender, as we can see in it’s different gender-marked articles. So you’re right that ME does not assign gender to nouns anymore, except for animate objects that are obviously either masculine or feminine – which is linked to semantics (I didn’t say it was morphological).

    True, many languages have more noun categories than m/f/n (e.g. Swahili), but I decided to focus on m/f/n which are the most common noun classes (in Indo-European languages). Should maybe have written a little more on that anyway. Thanks for pointing it out🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on 19/02/2011 by in Academia, Favourite posts, Linguistic Musings and tagged , , , .
%d bloggers like this: